Additive Manufacturing Q&A
Additive Manufacturing Q & A
Question:
What are some tips for helping to achieve consistent quality in our builds, especially in critical production-part applications?
Answer:
The first element of a controlled process is locking down the variables as much as possible, using process controls and documentation (PCD). This can be challenging with a technology that undergoes change and improves at such a rapid pace as does AM, but at some point a line must be drawn at which point no changes can be implemented.
One key element of PCD is development of a plan to calibrate, verify and maintain the AM equipment to ensure consistent operation. Other elements include contamination control, powder handling, and configuration control of the machine hardware, operating software, and process-parameter themes. With all of these elements under control, an AM shop then can begin to focus on demonstrating consistent quality to customers.
When demonstrating the ability to meet customer requirements, AM contract shops employ an array of conventional inspection techniques, including dimensional inspection through a CMM or structured-light, 2D or 3D radiography, fluid-penetrant inspection, microstructural evaluation and proof tests. However, these tests can prove expensive and time-consuming—customers considering AM for speed and cost benefits may find that inspection requirements can ruin the business case. Fortunately, though, AM processes can provide additional data that conventional manufacturing processes cannot provide, data that can be leveraged to offset some of the inspection needs.
For example, most AM equipment generates data prior to the build, during calibration and setup, as well as during and after the build. This data can come in the form of text, csv, image or PDF files, depending on the platform being used for production. The challenging question: How does the AM shop use all of this data?
At this point, the AM shop may have collected a lot of data and performed some amount of analysis. How, then, can it use the data to ensure consistent quality, as well as save time and money? This exercise hinges on the analysis of key process variables (KPVs)—the characteristics of the process that directly impact build quality. A producer must combine the information received through conventional inspection techniques with the output from the in-process data analysis to find correlations and identify which characteristics are true KPVs.
With the KPVs identified, the job then turns to establishing allowable values and tolerances for each KPV, and employing statistical process control (SPC). Shops can apply SPC in a variety of ways, but the most useful application initially rests on the use of control charts. A producer can maintain control charts with identified limits for each KPV to demonstrate that its process consistently meets the requirements.
Once a producer has control over its fixed process through a PCD plan, employs a robust data-management system, and has identified the KPVs for which it maintains control charts, it will be able to use AM to produce critical parts with consistent quality. 3DMP
Information provided by Mat Lewis and Adam Rivard, LAI International, a contract manufacturer of precision-engineered finished parts, components and subassemblies; www.laico.com. For more information, contact Adam Rivard at arivard@laico.com.
See also: LAI International Inc
Reader Comments
There are no comments posted at this time.